Calm the fuck down, J. I never said that the city couldn't be a character. A city is usually a setting. Not always, but usually. All settings are not characters. So if the city were a setting, it would not be a character. But at no point did I ever say the city had to be a setting. In the event of an intelligent city? It would be an intelligent being, and thus a character. It would also be a specific entity, and not just some random city which happens to be intelligent.
What is confusing about your sentence, aside from the original glaring typo, is your choice of articles. You use the phrase "a city"- a, implying that it is one of many cities out there- it is one of a group, which all share similar traits. Detroit is a city, not unlike New York City or Chicago or wherever else. None of these cities are intelligent. Therefore, the initial impulse is to assume the city that you are talking about is equally trivial.
Had you said 'the city', it would have been different. 'The' city, as in 'one of a kind'. This city has special and unique properties- if it didn't, it would just be 'a' city.
You also weren't taking flak for it until you flipped a shit.
Everyone look at JJJ! Hah! I am giving him flak so that he might take it! Hah!
What is confusing about your sentence, aside from the original glaring typo, is your choice of articles. You use the phrase "a city"- a, implying that it is one of many cities out there- it is one of a group, which all share similar traits. Detroit is a city, not unlike New York City or Chicago or wherever else. None of these cities are intelligent. Therefore, the initial impulse is to assume the city that you are talking about is equally trivial.
Had you said 'the city', it would have been different. 'The' city, as in 'one of a kind'. This city has special and unique properties- if it didn't, it would just be 'a' city.
You also weren't taking flak for it until you flipped a shit.
Everyone look at JJJ! Hah! I am giving him flak so that he might take it! Hah!
Comment